Comparative
physicochemical, phytochemical and high performance thin layer chromatography
evaluation of heart wood and small branches of Pterocarpus marsupium
Bhavana Srivastava1*,
Himanshu Sharma1, Vikas Chandra Sharma1, S.C. Verma2,
A.D. Jadhav1
1National Research Institute for Ayurveda Siddha Human
Resource Development, Aamkho, Gwalior-474009, (M.P), India.
2Pharmacopeia Commission for Indian Medicine &
Homeopathy, PLIM Campus, Kamala Nehru Nagar, Ghaziabad-201002.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: bhavanakan@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Pterocarpus marsupium commonly called Indian kino tree is a medicinal plant
widely used in Ayurveda. As per the Ayurvedic literature, heart wood of this
plant is used in Krmiroga, Kustha, Prameha, Pandu, and Medodosa. Removal of
heart wood from trunk of this tree may make this plant weak and susceptible to
damage by insects and natural elements. Due to which availability of this
plant may be difficult in near future for use in
Indian system of medicine. This work is an attempt to evaluate the
possibilities of using small branches in place of heart wood. The standard
parameters of small branches of P. marsupium have not been prepared yet. So
work is carried out to establish preliminary physicochemical and phytochemical
standards of small branches of P. marsupium. Heart wood and small branches of P. marsupium are compared on
the basis of physicochemical analysis, phytochemical analysis and high
performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC). Total
phenolic contents of heart wood and small branches in terms of tannic
acid equivalent were 36.65±0.90 and 41.91±1.05 mg/g, respectively and total flavonoid contents in
terms of querecetin equivalent were 56.30±0.38 and 70.22±1.25 mg/g, respectively. Phytochemical analysis of heartwood and small branches showed the
presence of phenols, tannins, alkaloids, carbohydrates, saponins,
proteins, steroids, flavanoids, coumarin, quinine and furanoids in various extracts tested. HPTLC of n-hexane,
ethyl acetate and ethanol extracts of heart wood and small branches showed
different phytochemical profile. Difference in HPTLC profiles suggests that
small branches cannot be used in place of heart wood and further research is required to
find out the substitute for heart
wood of P. marsupium. Study will be helpful in the identification and quality control
of P. marsupium and can provide standard HPTLC
profiles of P. marsupium with selected solvent system
for use as a reference for the proper identification/ authentication of the
drug. Good amount of total
phenolics and total flavonoids in small branches and HPTLC profile with many
bands indicates that small branches may also have potential active constituents
and may be studied for various pharmacological activities.
KEYWORDS: Pterocarpus marsupium, physicochemical analysis, phytochemical analysis, HPTLC profile.
INTRODUCTION:
Asia represents one of the most important centers of
knowledge with regard to use of medicinal plants in providing health care for both humans and animals
not only in diseased condition but also as potential material for maintaining
proper health. There are many medicinal
plants which are slow-growing forest trees and heart wood of which is part
mainly utilized. Removal of heart wood from trunk of these trees makes the
plant weak and susceptible to damage by insects and natural elements. To
safeguard the survival of these plants and to make them available for future
generation usages of heart wood of trunk are prohibited. Because of this
manufacturers and dealers of Ayurveda, Siddha and Unani drugs face trouble in
getting regular supply of heart wood of big trees. Therefore, to ensure the
availability of heartwood as raw material, there is strong need to explore the
possibility of substitution of heartwood of the trunk with suitable
alternate. An approach which
would satisfy the necessities of sustainable harvesting, yet simultaneously
provide for health care needs, would be the substitution of heart wood or
underground parts with aerial part of the same plant.
Pterocarpus
marsupium (Family:
Fabaceae) commonly called Indian kino tree (Asana) is a medicinal plant widely
used in Ayurveda.
As per Ayurvedic literature, heart wood of this plant is
used in krmiroga, kustha, prameha, pandu, medodosa1. It is also
reported for cardio tonic activity2, alloxan-induced diabeties3,
glucose tolerance effect4, hypoglycemic activity 5,6,
antihyperlipidemic effect7, gastric
ulceration8, cytokine TNF-α in type 2 diabeties9,
anti-hyperglycemic activity10, free radical scavenging activity11,
antiallergic, antianaphylactic and mast cell stabilizing activity12.
Heart wood of this plant mainly contains pterostilbene13, marsupsin,
liquiritigenin, isoliquiritigenin, pterosupin, p-hydroxyl benzaldehyde, 7, 4′-dihydroxyflavone, (2R)-3-(p-hydroxyphenyl) lactic acid14,
propterol15, marsupol16, carpusin17, C-glucoside, 1-(2',6'-dihydroxyphenyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside18, C-glucosides, pteroside, pteroisoauroside,
marsuposide, flavon C-glucoside, vijayosin,
C-β-D-glucopyranosyl-2,6-dihydroxyl benzene and sesquiterpene19.
Removal of heart wood from trunk of
this tree may affect the survival of this plant due to which
availability of this plant may be difficult in near future for use in Indian
system of medicine. Present study is an attempt to evaluate the
possibilities of using small branches in place of heart wood. The standard parameters of small branches of P.
marsupium have not been prepared yet. So work is also carried out to establish
preliminary physicochemical and phytochemical standards of small branches.
MATERIAL
AND METHODS:
Plant
material
The heart wood
and small branches of P. marsupium
were collected from NVARI, Jhansi (U.P.) India, identified and authenticated by
the botanist of NRIASHRD, Gwalior.
Instrumentation
A CAMAG HPTLC
system (Muttenz, Switzerland) equipped with a semi automatic TLC applicator
Linomat IV, twin trough plate development chamber, Win CATS software version
1.4.2 and Hamilton (Reno, Nevada, USA) Syringe (100 μl).
Material
and reagents
All chemicals,
reagents and solvents used during the experiments were of analytical grade and
HPTLC plates were purchased from E. Merck Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India).
Physicochemical
parameters
Heart
wood and small branches were studied for various physicochemical standards like
foreign matter, loss on drying at 105°C, total ash, acid-insoluble ash, alcohol
soluble extractive, water soluble extractive and pH 10% solution using standard
methods20, 21.
Preliminary
phytochemical screening
n-Hexane, ethyl acetate and
ethanol extract of both heart wood and small branches were screened for the
presence of phenols, tannins, carbohydrates, saponins, alkaloids, proteins,
flavonoids, phytosterols, furanoids, coumarin and quinone by the standard
methods of Harbone20 and Kokate 21.
Estimation of
total phenolic and flavonoid content
Five grams of
each of the shade-dried plant material was pulverized into coarse powder and
subjected to ethanolic extraction using soxhlet apparatus. The extracts were
concentrated to dryness. The dried residues were then dissolved in 100 ml of
95% ethanol. The extracts were used for total phenolic and flavonoid assay.
The total
phenolics content was determined by using the Folin-Ciocalteu assay22. An aliquot (1 ml) of extracts or standard
solution of tannic acid (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 μg/ml) was added to a 25
ml volumetric flask, containing 9 ml of distilled water. A reagent blank was
prepared using distilled water. One millilitre of Folin-Ciocalteu phenol
reagent was added to the mixture and shaken. After 5 min, 10 ml of 7% Na2CO3
solution was added to the mixture. The volume was then made up to the mark.
After incubation for 90 min at room temperature, the absorbance against the
reagent blank was determined at 550 nm with an UV/Vis spectrophotometer. Total
phenolics content was expressed as mg tannic acid equivalents (TAE).
Total flavonoid
content was measured by the aluminum chloride colorimetric assay23. An aliquot (1 ml) of extracts or standard solutions
of quercetin (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 μg/ml) was added to a 10 ml
volumetric flask containing 4 ml of distilled water. To the flask, 0.30 ml of
5% NaNO2 was added and after 5 min, 0.3 ml of 10% AlCl3
was added. After 5 min, 2 ml of 1M NaOH was added and the volume was made up to
10 ml with distilled water. The solution was mixed and absorbance was measured
against the blank at 510 nm. The total flavonoid content was expressed as mg
quercetin equivalents (QE).
HPTLC
profiles
HPTLC
studies were carried out following the method of Sethi24, Stahl25
and Wagner et al26. The heart wood and small branches were powdered
coarsely. Ten gram powdered samples of each of heart wood and small
branches were accurately weighed and exhaustively extracted by n-hexane,
ethyl acetate and ethanol (each 100 ml) separately using soxhlet apparatus. The
extracts were filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure and made up to10
ml in standard flasks separately.
The mobile phase
used for developing the n-hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol extracts of
heart wood and small branches was toluene: ethyl acetate 7:3 (v/v).
The
samples were spotted in the form of bands of width 10 mm with a 100 μl
Hamilton syringe on aluminum TLC plates pre-coated with Silica gel 60 F254
of 0.2 mm thickness with the help of TLC semi-automatic applicator Linomat IV
attached to CAMAG HPTLC system, which was programmed through Win CATS software
version 1.4.2. 10 μl of each extracts of heart wood and small branches were applied in two tracks
as 10 mm bands at a spraying rate of 10 seconds/μl. Track 1 was heart wood
and track 2 was small branches for each of the extracts applied.
Development
of the plate up to a migration distance of 80 mm was performed at 27 ± 2°C with
mobile phase for each extracts in a CAMAG HPTLC chamber previously saturated
for 30 min. After development the plate was dried at 60°C in an oven for 5 min and visualized under wavelength 254 nm and
366 nm for ultra violet detection. The developed
plate was then dipped in anisaldehyde sulphuric acid reagent for derivatization
and dried at 105°C in hot air oven till the colour of the band appears and
visualized under white light. Images were captured by keeping the plates in
photodocumentation chamber and Rf values were recorded by Win CATS
software.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Physicochemical
parameters like foreign matter, loss on drying at 105º C, ash values, acid insoluble ash, extractive values and pH values
are given in Table 1. These data can be used for identification of the drug.
Both the parts of P. marsupium were found to possess little moisture and hence can be
stored at room temperature without fear of spoilage. Approximately same value
for alcohol soluble and water soluble extractives for both heart wood and small
branches indicates the presence of approximately same amount of polar and non
polar extractable compounds in heart wood and small branches.
Table 1:
Physicochemical parameters of heart wood and small branches of P. marsupium.
S. No. |
Parameters |
Results |
|
Heart wood |
Small branches |
||
1. |
Foreign matter (% w/w) |
Nil |
Nil |
2. |
Loss on drying (% w/w) |
6.478 |
6.863 |
3. |
Total ash (% w/w) |
1.874 |
1.484 |
4. |
Acid insoluble ash (% w/w) |
0.435 |
0.427 |
5. |
Alcohol soluble extractive value (% w/w) |
7.167 |
6.66 |
6. |
Water soluble extractive value (% w/w) |
6.50 |
5.338 |
7. |
pH of 10 % aqueous solution |
7.72 |
7.41 |
The
results of phytochemical analysis of different extracts of heart wood and small
branches are shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Phytochemical analysis of extracts
of heart wood and small branches of P. marsupium.
Phytochemicals |
Heart wood |
Small branches |
||||
n-Hexane |
Ethyl acetate |
Ethanol |
n-Hexane |
Ethyl acetate |
Ethanol |
|
Phenols |
-ve |
-ve |
+ve |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
Tannins |
-ve |
-ve |
+ve |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
Alkaloids |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
Carbohydrates |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
Saponins |
-ve |
-ve |
-ve |
-ve |
-ve |
-ve |
Proteins |
+ve |
+ve |
+ve |
+ve |
+ve |
+ve |
Steroids |
-ve |
-ve |
+ve |
-ve |
-ve |
+ve |
Flavanoids |
-ve |
-ve |
+ve |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
Coumarin |
-ve |
-ve |
+ve |
-ve |
-ve |
+ve |
Quinone |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
Furanoids |
-ve |
-ve |
+ve |
-ve |
+ve |
+ve |
Figure 1: HPTLC profile of n-hexane extracts of heart wood and small branches of P. marsupium (track 1: heart wood, track 2: small branches).
Proteins
were found to be present in hexane extract of both heart wood and small
branches. In ethyl acetate extract alkaloids, carbohydrates, proteins and quinone were found present in both
heart wood and small branches whereas phenols, tannins flavonoid and
furanoids were found present only in small branches.
In ethanol extract alkaloids, phenols,
tannins, carbohydrates, proteins, steroids, flavanoids, coumarin, quinone and
furanoids were found present in both heart wood and
small branches.
Total amount of phenolics and flavonoids content of
ethanoilc extract of heart wood and small branches of P.
marsupium are summarized in Table 3. Results indicate that in
comparison to heart wood, small branches had the high total phenolic and
flavonoid content.
Table
3: Total phenolic and total flavonoid content of ethanolic extracts of heart wood and small
branches of P. marsupium
S. No. |
Plant parts |
Total phenolics
mg of TAE/g dry weight* |
Total
flavonoids mg of QUE/g dry weight* |
1. |
Heart wood |
36.65±0.90 |
56.30±0.38 |
2. |
Small branches |
41.91±1.05 |
70.22±1.25 |
*Values are expressed as Mean ±
SD
Comparative
HPTLC profile of n-hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol extracts of heart
wood and small branches of P. marsupium were recorded to reveal the chemical pattern of each extract. The
HPTLC profile of n-hexane extract of
both heart wood and small branches (Figure 1 and Table 4) showed no band when
visualized under UV at 254 nm. At UV 366 nm, heart wood and small branches
showed two and three bands, respectively out of which only one band at Rf 0.63 (florescent blue) found similar.
Visualization under white light after derivatization with anisaldehyde sulphuric acid reagent both heart wood and small branches showed four
bands but no band found similar. This indicates the
presence of different compounds in hexane extract of heart wood and small
branches.
Table 4: Rf
value of n-hexane
extract of P. marsupium.
S. No. |
Wavelength |
Heart wood |
Small branches |
1. |
254 nm |
No band |
No band |
2. |
366 nm |
0.63, 0.69 |
0.63, 0.68, 0.75 |
3. |
Visible light after derivatization |
0.44, 0.51, 0.59, 0.87 |
0.43, 0.50, 0.62, 0.86 |
The HPTLC
profile of ethyl acetate extract of heart wood and small branches (Figure 2 and
Table 5) showed three and two bands, respectively at UV at 254 nm and no bands
found similar. At UV 366 heart wood and small branches showed eight and four
bands, respectively and no band found similar. Visualization under white light
after derivatization with anisaldehyde
sulphuric acid reagent, heart
wood and small branches showed three and seven bands, respectively again none
found similar. These results show the presence of different compounds in ethyl
acetate extract of heart wood and small branches also.
Table 5:
Rf value of ethyl acetate extract of P. marsupium.
S. No. |
Wavelength |
Heart wood |
Small branches |
1. |
254 nm |
0.27, 47, 0.61 |
0.09, 0.15 |
2. |
366 nm |
0.05, 0.19, 0.27, 0.39, 0.47, 0.61, 0.69, 0.74 |
0.10, 0.21, 0.63, 0.69 |
3. |
Visible light after derivatization |
0.48, 0.52, 0.87 |
0.08, 0.14, 0.21, 0.47, 0.51, 0.29, 0.86 |
Figure 2: HPTLC profile of ethyl acetate extracts of heart wood and small branches of P. marsupium (track 1: heart wood, track 2: small branches).
HPTLC profile of
ethanol extract of heart wood and small branches (Figure 3 and Table 6) showed
no band and one band, respectively when visualized under UV at 254 nm. At UV
366 heart wood and small branches showed six bands and two bands, respectively
out of which only one band at Rf 0.64 (Florescent blue) found
similar. Visualization under white light after derivatization with anisaldehyde sulphuric acid reagent, both heart wood and small branches showed
four bands out of which only one bands at Rf 0.46 (blue) found
similar. This indicates the presence of different compounds in ethanol extract
of heart wood and small branches also.
Table 6:
Rf value of ethanol extract of P. marsupium.
S. No. |
Wavelength |
Heart wood |
Small branches |
1. |
254 nm |
No band |
0.09 |
2. |
366 nm |
0.05, 0.42,
0.49, 0.64, 0.71, 0.78 |
0.10, 0.64 |
3. |
Visible light
after derivatization |
0.46, 0.52,
0.63, 0.88 |
0.46, 0.50,
0.56, 0.85 |
Figure 3: HPTLC profile of ethanol
extracts of heart wood and small
branches of P. marsupium (track 1: heart wood, track 2: small branches).
CONCLUSION:
Present study carried out in P. marsupium will be helpful in the identification and
quality control of the drug and can provide standard HPTLC profiles with
selected solvent system. The HPTLC profile can also be used as a reference for
the proper identification/ authentication of the drug. Difference in HPTLC profiles of n-hexane, ethyl
acetate and ethanol extracts of heart wood and small branches suggests that
small branches cannot be used in place of heart wood and further research is required to
find out the suitable substitute for heart wood of P. marsupium. Good
amount of total phenolics and total flavonoids in small branches and HPTLC
profile with many bands indicates that small branches may also have potential
active constituents and may be studied for various pharmacological activities.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Authors
are thankful to CCRAS, New Delhi for financial assistance and Director General,
CCRAS, New Delhi for providing facilities.
REFERENCE:
1.
The
Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Department of Indian System of Medicine and Homeopathy. Part I Vol-I New Delhi: Government of
India.1999; 1st ed. 15-16.
2.
Mohire
NC, Salunkhe VR, Bhise SB et al. Cardio tonic activity of aqueous extract of
heartwood of Pterocarpus marsupium.
Indian Journal Experimental Biology. 45; 2007: 532-537.
3.
Mukhtar HM, Ansari SH, Ali M et al. Effect of aqueous extract of Pterocarpus marsupium wood on
alloxan-induced diabetic in rats. Pharmazie. 60 (6); 2005: 478-479.
4.
Gupta SS. Effect of Gymnema
sylvestre and Pterocarpus marsupium
on glucose tolerance in albino rats. Indian Journal Medicine Science. 17; 1963: 501-505.
5.
Shah DS. A preliminary study of the hypoglycemic action of
heartwood of Pterocarpus marsupium
Roxb. Indian
Journal of Medical Research. 55 (2); 1967: 166-168.
6.
Kidwai
JR et al. Hypoglycemic activity of Pterocarpus
marsupium wood. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 35; 1991: 71–75.
7.
Jahromi
MA, Ray AB and Chansouria JPN. Antihyperlipidemic effect of flavonoids from Pterocarpus marsupium. Journal
of Natural Products. 56 (7); 1993: 989–994.
8.
Joshi MC, Dorababu M, Prabha T et
al. Effects of Pterocarpus marsupium on NIDDM-induced rat
gastric ulceration and mucosal offensive and defensive factors. Indian Journal
of Pharmacology. 36; 2004: 296-302.
9.
Halagappa K, Girish HN and Srinivasan BP. The study of aqueous extract of Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. On cytokine TNF-α in type 2
diabetic rats. Indian Journal of Pharmacology.
42 (6); 2010: 392–396.
10. Manickam M, Ramanathan M, Jahromi MA et al.
Anti-hyperglycemic activity of phenolics from Pterocarpus marsupium. Journal of
Natural Products. 60; 1997: 609–610.
11. Yeole YG, Wadher SJ and Gaikwad NJ. Free
radical scavenging activity of water extract of heartwood of Pterocarpus marsupium. Journal of
Natural Remedies. 8; 2008: 89–92.
12. Suralkar AA, Vaidya GS, Borate AR et
al. Antiallergic, antianaphylactic and
mast cell stabilizing activity of Pterocarpus
marsupium Roxb. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and
Biomedical Sciences. 3; 2012: 1691-1697.
13. Mathew J, Subba Rao AV and Subba Rao NV
(Late). Photo oxidation of pterostilbene from Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb.
Current Science 46; 1977: 337-338.
14. Maurya R,
Ray AB. Constituents of Pterocarpus
marsupium. Journal of Natural Products. 47 (1); 1984: 179-181.
15. Mathew J, Subba Rao AV and Rambhav S. Propterol an antibacterial agent
from Pterocarpus marsupium.
Current Science. 53 (11); 1984: 576-577.
18. Suri KA, Satti NK, Gupta BD et al. 1-(2',
6' dihydroxyphenyl) -(i-D-glucopyranoside, a novel C-glycoside from Pterocarpus marsupium. Indian Journal of
Chemistry. 42; 2003: 432-433.
19. Maurya R, Singh R, Deepak M et al.
Constituents of Pterocarpus marsupium:
an Ayurvedic crude drug. Phytochemistry. 65 (7); 2004: 915-920.
20. Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods: A guide
to modern techniques of plant analysis. Chapman and Hall Co., New York. 1998;
3rd ed.
21. Kokate CK, Purohit AP. and Gokhale SB.
Pharmacognosy. Nirali Prakashan, Pune. India. 2007; 39th ed.
22. Singleton VL and Rossi Jr. JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics
with phosphomolybdic phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology
Viticulture. 16; 1965: 144-158.
23. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T and Jianming W. The
determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on
superoxide radicals. Food Chemistry. 64 (4); 1999: 555-559.
24. Sethi PD. High performance thin layer
chromatography. CBS Publishers and Distributers, Vol. X. New Delhi. 1996;
Student 1st ed.
25. Stahl I. Thin layer chromatography. A
laboratory hand book.: Springer- Verlag.: Berlin. 1969.
26. Wagner H. and Bladt S. Plant drug analysis a
thin layer chromatography atlas, Springer-Verlag. Germany.1984; 2nd ed.
Received
on 04.01.2016 Modified on 10.01.2016
Accepted
on 27.01.2016 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2016; 8(2): 53-59
DOI: 10.5958/0975-4385.2016.00010.8